Judgment of Li Moumou's case was announced, Internet Lawyers Association will investigate-Australia

Release your eyes, put on headphones, and listen~!

2014-01-24|
10: 33 |
Source: Beiqing Net |
Editor: Beibei

 

李某某案中被告人王某的辩护律师周翠丽继自曝受律协处分的决定书后,又将判决书隐去个人信息后截图贴在微博里作为公开申辩证, Making the details of the case fully exposed.

继几天前在公开将律协的处理决定书发在自己的微博上之后,昨天下午,李某某案中王某的代理律师周翠丽,又将法院李某某案的一审判决书发布在她新浪的微博上。北京青年报记者看到,判决书的首页上,“记录封存,不得提供他人”的红色印章,非常醒目。周律师此举,再次引起了公众的关注。

Whether to archive记录 法院一审二审结论不同

记者当即打电话给周律师。周律师说,她收到的一审判决是有“记录封存,不得提供他人”的章,认为一审判决盖这个章,是错误的,是法院搞错了。因为在她收到的二审判决,已经没有了“记录封存,不得提供他人”的章了。所以,她认为法院是更正了一审的错误。她拿到的这份判决书,是属于可以公开发布的法律文书,不属于“未成年记录封存”的案件。

Lawyer Zhou said that since the court ruled in the second instance not to be "sealed up", it should not be sealed up in the first instance. In other words, in the second instance, the court maintained only the judgment of the first instance, and whether it was "sealed up" should not be the decision of the first instance. Since the second instance did not maintain the "sealed", then the first instance should also not be sealed. Therefore, she published the verdict on Weibo. Her purpose is to hope that the public knows the truth of the case, and she thinks that there is nothing wrong with it.

李某某案的档案 按法律规定不在“封存”之列

记者了解,未成年档案封存,是近年司法部门推出的新举。根最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、部、国家安全部、司法部2012年联合出台的《关于建立personnel记录制度的意见》,对于时不满十八周岁,被判处五年有期徒刑以下刑罚的未成年人的记录,应当予以封存。记录被封存后,不得向任何和个人提供,但司法机关为办案需要或者有关root国家规定进行查询的除外。依法进行查询的,应当对被封存的记录的情况予以保密。

按照上述规定,李某某案的五名被告中,王某是成年人,他的档案不在封存之列。此外,李某虽然尚未成年,但他被判处10年有期徒刑,也不在“档案封存”之列。但其他几名被告属于未成年人,按规定判决书是应该在“封存”之列。

dispute

There are different opinions on whether it is appropriate to post the judgment of the case online

介绍,李某某案是团伙案件,判决书内容是完全一样的。李某某案涉及的五名罪犯,有的是未成年,有的是成年。在一份判决书中,未成年被告拿到的判决印着“记录封存”红章,年被告拿到的则没有。封存还是不封存,尚没有统一说法。

In addition, whether it is appropriate to post this verdict on the Internet, there are different opinions from all walks of life.

A person from the procuratorate who did not want to be named told a reporter from the Beijing Youth Daily that the Li Moumou case has become a highly concerned case and involves minors. From any point of view, it should not be posted online. .

And另一名律师说,周翠丽律师的做法,法律方面,似乎也没有什么大问题。如果实在要追究的话,那也只是属于律师职业道德层面的问题。

An industry insider said that if lawyer Zhou Cuili had previously been dealt with by relevant departments for improper disclosure of information and leaking the privacy of the client, then lawyer Zhou's behavior this time is undoubtedly an expression of previous mistakes. Because of the careful reading of the judgment, all the details of the crime committed by the persons involved were almost completely exposed. Although she has processed some of the personal information, the privacy of the person involved is still clear to the public. He believes that the relevant departments should deal with this behavior seriously.

Lawyers Association response

律协表示已知此事 着手调查

法院不愿意透露姓名的人士介绍,“悬案封存”是法院的基本原则,李某某案的档案是肯定要封存的,而且全案封存。因为必须保护几名未成年被判处有期徒刑5年以下,和缓刑的罪犯。这位人士称,周翠丽律师的行为是极其恶劣的,法院已向司法局,市律协投诉。希望有关部门尽快给予处理。

记者致电北京市律协,有关人士称,律协已得知周翠丽律师将判决书发到微博上的事,着手调查。纪律部门责令从网上撤下。律协已决定近一两天约周翠丽律师谈话。周翠丽律师是否会因此次行为承担更严重的处理结果,不得而知。

Related posts

Buy sugar for TA
{{Data.count}} people in total
People have appreciated
China News

In 2014, China will choose a certain "tiger" as a breakthrough in anti-corruption

2014-1-24 12: 17: 23

China News

Demolition couple burns continued: Police say their eldest son instigated self-immolation-Australia

2014-1-24 12: 36: 01

0 replies AArticle author Madministrator
    No discussion yet, let me talk about your views
Personal center
shopping cart
coupon
Sign in today
New private message Private message list
Search