10: 33 |
Source: Beiqing Net |
李某某案中被告人王某的辩护律师周翠丽继自曝受律协处分的决定书后，又将判决书隐去个人信息后截图贴在微博里作为公开申辩证according to, Making the details of the case fully exposed.
Whether to archivecrime记录 法院一审二审结论不同
Lawyer Zhou said that since the court ruled in the second instance not to be "sealed up", it should not be sealed up in the first instance. In other words, in the second instance, the court maintained only the judgment of the first instance, and whether it was "sealed up" should not be the decision of the first instance. Since the second instance did not maintain the "sealed", then the first instance should also not be sealed. Therefore, she published the verdict on Weibo. Her purpose is to hope that the public knows the truth of the case, and she thinks that there is nothing wrong with it.
according to记者了解，未成年crime档案封存，是近年司法部门推出的新举。根according to最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、public security部、国家安全部、司法部2012年联合出台的《关于建立crimepersonnelcrime记录制度的意见》，对于crime时不满十八周岁，被判处五年有期徒刑以下刑罚的未成年人的crime记录，应当予以封存。crime记录被封存后，不得向任何unit和个人提供，但司法机关为办案需要或者有关unitrootaccording to国家规定进行查询的除外。依法进行查询的unit，应当对被封存的crime记录的情况予以保密。
There are different opinions on whether it is appropriate to post the judgment of the case online
In addition, whether it is appropriate to post this verdict on the Internet, there are different opinions from all walks of life.
A person from the procuratorate who did not want to be named told a reporter from the Beijing Youth Daily that the Li Moumou case has become a highly concerned case and involves minors. From any point of view, it should not be posted online. .
An industry insider said that if lawyer Zhou Cuili had previously been dealt with by relevant departments for improper disclosure of information and leaking the privacy of the client, then lawyer Zhou's behavior this time is undoubtedly an expression of previous mistakes. Because of the careful reading of the judgment, all the details of the crime committed by the persons involved were almost completely exposed. Although she has processed some of the personal information, the privacy of the person involved is still clear to the public. He believes that the relevant departments should deal with this behavior seriously.
Lawyers Association response